Wednesday, May 22, 2019
Action or Inaction and the Ethics of Choice Essay
One of Peter Singers four master(prenominal) principles of ethics is that we are just as responsible for our in trifleions as we are for our actions. This office that we as human beings have an ethical obligation to act if we attend something wrong happening. Even if we do non see it but we know it is going on, then once we possess that knowledge we have also incurred a moral duty to act. Without this obligation, we become a liability to the community because we are no longer taking indebtedness for the well-being of others when it is in our power to do so.Examples of this are easily found in the modern media. The first example of such an understood and implicit responsibility would be in the case of Penn give in and their football defensive coordinator, Jerry Sandusky. Jerry Sandusky committed horrible crimes, molesting and sexually assaulting numerous young boys who were looking to him to help them out of already bad situations at home via his charity, sulfur Mile. These wer e at risk youth. The head coach of Penn States football team, Joe Paterno, had been alerted to the crimes possibly being committed by his defensive coordinator but he had failed to act or contact law enforcement.The president of the university also was accused of knowing but taking no action. (1) In the eyes of the public, once the criminal psychometric test began to get underway, the head coach and the president were both equally guilty for allowing such atrocities to go on under their noses. To the American people and the plaintiffs, simply saying, It wasnt me that wounded these boys. was not enough to excuse their inaction. They had failed in their civic duty to protect the community and its children. To fail a society in this manner means you have become a hindrance and a liability to the people who once sustained you.It is no small question to wonder where the line is drawn between an obligation to action and the freedom to do nothing. Not only is it illegal to rob a bank, i t is equally illegal to drive the getaway car. True, as a mere driver, you did not in fact steal money or hurt anyone. However, by your own inaction (you did not call the cops, you did not discourage the robbers), you have enabled harm to be brought to others. The consequences then are that had you acted, harm may have been avoided. Just as if you had held the gun yourself, your knowledge means that you acted to hurt someone else even if it was simply by not acting.Many cultures have shame and honor systems which detail explicitly the duties of a citizen to act and the restrictions on actions as well. American law makes very clear pronouncements about guilt by association, being an alibi, being an accomplice, and other specific things required by those who stood by. We as a people do not accept inaction as an excuse to avoid blame. Peter Singers specific principle denotes the ability to have between action and inaction automatically confers upon the decider the weight of their pic kaxe. Once you are aware that you have a choice to make, you also should be aware that the choice rightly bears consequences.Surprisingly, many people find this unfair. They do not believe they hold any blame if they choose not to take action. If a woman is raped in a street in broad daylight with fifty witnesses, almost all the witnesses will step that it was not their problem, not their responsibility to stop it or report it. When confronted later, they will squirm with shame, but as the well-known case of Kitty Genovese (2) proved, they do not honestly feel they did anything wrong. Therefore, the ethical idea of responsibility for both action and inaction is an idea that still needs advocates throughout the world. The social contract that exists between man and his governance also extends to man and his fellow man.Works cited1.) Simon, M. (2012, November 7). Former Penn State president arraigned in Sandusky scandal This Just In CNN.com Blogs. Retrieved November 8, 2012, from http//news.blogs.cnn.com/2012/11/07/former-penn-state-president-arraigned-in-sandusky-scandal 2.) Darley, L. (2010, August 19). Bystander Effect The lesson of Kitty Genovese. Retrieved November 8, 2012, from
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.