BUSINESS LAW Master Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

BUSINESS LAW Master - Case Study ExampleThe sheer also contained a clause that Supercool would not be liable for some(prenominal) loss or damage caused during stocking or maintainence of the show shell by the faculty of supercool.On the 30th of November 2008, Nick, now an employee of Supercool, made a delivery of the special(a) lager to the bar at the football ground, and commenced to clean the glass case before stocking it. Unfortunately he stumbled and fell as he was cleaning the shield glass, causing several panes to break and crash to the ground. Falling glass caused damage to some bar furniture. One piece of broken glass caused a trounce to the shin and right foot of Ethel, a member of the bar staff. Ethel didnt seek medical attention immediately, and, a week later the wound became badly infected, causing a permanent restriction of movement in her foot.John is now demanding compensation for damage caused to the bar area, and Ethel is claiming against Supercool for her inj uries. Supercool engage referred John to the clause in the contract, and have denied any liability to Ethel for her injuries on the basis that it was Nick and not the partnership who caused the injury and that, in any event, her failure to seek medical help immediately, has amend anyone from legal liability for her injuries.I would advise Supercool that they have a bright chance to defend ... The Question of Compensation to John for the damage caused to the bar area.I would advise Supercool that they have a bright chance to defend the claim from John. As per the facts of the case on the 15th of November,2008, the partnership agreed with John, the manager of neutral township F.C. to manufacture 5000 bottles of premium lager commemorating the clubs light speed years in the football league. Under the terms of the contract Supercool would provide a king-size glass show case for six months, which would be both stocked and maintained by employees of Supercool in Inkys bar located at the football ground. The contract also contained a clause that Supercool would not be liable for any loss or damage caused during stocking or maintainence of the show case by the staff of supercool. According to the basic ingredients of the contract act there was a perfectly valid contract between John as the manger of Inky Town F.C. and Supercool. There was an agreement between John and Supercool and later on the agreement culminated in to a full fledged contract after both the parties approach shot on an agreement on the terms of the contract. There was meeting of minds between John and Supercool in the same sense and no ambiguity regarding anything. The facts of the following case Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.(1893)I.Q.B.256 amply demonstrate the principles as to offer, acceptance Contract - Offer by Advertisement - Performance of Condition in Advertisement - tattle of Acceptance of Offer - Wager - Insurance - 8 9 Vict. c. 109 - 14 Geo. 3, c. 48, s. 2. The defendants, the proprietors of a medical preparation called The Carbolic Smoke Ball, issued an advertisement in which they offered to pay 100 to any person who contracted the influenza after having used one of